1. Moncure Conway (1832–1907) was one of the few southerners
whose life was transformed by his encounter with Transcendentalism. Conway’s
life unfolded in ways that proved indicative of the history of
Transcendentalism. His life also reveals why Transcendentalism was primarily a
northern movement. Conway was a Virginian, born to a wealthy family near
Fredericksburg. His father and brothers
were slaveholders and southern sympathizers, but his mother was more liberal in
her thinking as Conway also became. He was
first exposed to the ideals of Emerson at Dickinson (1847). At this time, the South was suspicious of
Transcendentalism and especially of Emerson because his egalitarian ideas were
a direct threat to an aristocratic, slave-holding society. Conway wrote to
Emerson claiming to be “a Natural Radical—to whose soul Radicalism is as air to
a bird,” and he lamented his upbringing among conservative southerners.
It was while studying at Harvard
Divinity School that he met Emerson, Thoreau, and Alcott. Conway became an avid abolitionist under the
influence of Theodore Parker and William Lloyd Garrison, among others much to
the astonishment of his aristocratic southern family.
Conway became a Methodist minister
after graduating from Harvard Divinity School in 1854, but his own religious
doubts caused him to become a Unitarian within a year. He became minister of First Unitarian Church
in Washington, D.C., but he was soon dismissed for preaching that slavery was
immoral. When he took his new wife to Virginia she scandalized the family when
she embraced and then kissed a young female slave. Conway visited the White House in an effort
to convince Lincoln to free all slaves, but although he failed at the time, he led
his own family’s escaped slaves to freedom in Ohio.
Unable to retain the consistent
optimism he attributed to Emerson, he eventually abandoned the organized church
altogether. His abandonment of religion was spurred in part by the death of
his young son, named Emerson, as Darwin’s disillusionment was also brought
about by his 10-year-old daughter’s death.
Conway, like Emerson before him, eventually left organized religion altogether
in favor of a secular and scientific version of spirituality. As he wrote after giving up on the idea of a
personal God: “Eyes turned from phantom gods have caught glimpses of a divine
life in the evolution of nature, and the mystical movement at the heart of man”
(Christianity, 1876).
Dissatisfied with life in America
during this time, Conway moved to England after the Civil War ended. In
London, Conway continued his career as a social activist and public speaker,
and soon came to know a wide range of England’s most influential people such as
Charles Dickens, Thomas Carlyle, and Charles Darwin. Conway was able to continue his free thinking
ideals (abolition, women’s suffrage, complete religious freedom or freedom from
religion) in the more conducive and accepting climate in England. To this day,
Conway Hall in London’s Red Lion Square stands as a memorial to his influence.
Conway traveled back and forth
between England and America, never feeling quite at home in either place. After the Civil War ended he ended up in
Paris, where he died in 1907.
Like
Emerson and Fuller, Conway contributed to the internationalization of
Transcendentalist ideas by traveling overseas and publishing works that were
widely read throughout Europe: Testimonies Concerning Slavery (1864), The
Sacred Anthology: A Book of Ethical Scriptures (1874), and an autobiography
that appeared three years before his death.
2. Prophet,
poet and madman, Jones Very was, to say the very least, unique among the men of
his time. His childhood was unconventional, his college career exemplary, and
his religious enthusiasm literate and profound. He in essence went where others
feared to tread.[1] Jones
Very was a curious but impassioned zealot, and some, especially Very himself,
said that he was chosen by God, while others thought he was just plain
insane. However, what cannot be doubted
is that Very produced poems and other writings that helped to solidify a link
between independent or artistic thinking and eccentric behavior.
Jones
Very (1813–1880), was one of those divinely inspired religious madmen who
appear at certain points in history and produce a powerful effect on people
around them. It is said that Very moved
early in life into the circle of New England intellectuals of the period. He
was born in Salem to first cousins who never married, and his mother was an
outspoken atheist. Very went to Harvard
where he won the Bowdoin Prize two years in a row and drew praise for his work
as a classicist and for his essays on poetry and religious topics. Very was influenced by European Romantic
writers and by Shakespeare and, soon after his first reading of Nature,
by Emerson. Emerson’s Divinity School Address set forth ideas
Very took to heart: “The man who renounces himself, comes to himself,” and the
poet should make himself into “a newborn bard of the Holy Ghost,—cast behind
you all conformity, and acquaint men at first hand with Deity.” This kind of direct witness and mystical
nonconformity became Very’s goal.
In 1838, Very underwent his powerful
spiritual rebirth: “In my senior year in college I experienced what is commonly
called a change of heart, which tells us that all we have belongs to God and
that we ought to have no will of our own.”
His crisis and resulting
move toward an otherworldly mysticism was so extreme that he was committed for
a month to the McLean Asylum for the mentally ill. He said that he had been
personally chosen by God.
After graduation Very stayed at
Harvard as a divinity student and tutor of Greek, but by the autumn of 1838, he
was encouraging his students that they should “Flee to the mountains, for the end
of all things is at hand.” His writings
indicate that at times he clearly saw himself as a
sort
of second coming of a Christ-like divinity:
I
saw on earth another light
Than
that which lit my eye
Come
forth as from my soul within,
And
from a higher sky (“The Light from
Within”)
Very
published a book of essays and poems with the encouragement and editorial
guidance of Emerson who supported Very’s literary talent. Emerson personally reviewed Very’s poems and
essays in 1841 in The Dial.
As
a writer, Very had what many saw as the audacity to assume God’s voice or point
of view. He wrote hundreds of poems in total, many surrounding his intense
conversion or “new birth” but also many after he received permission to preach
as a Unitarian in 1843. The general mood
of Transcendentalist inquiry often produced this type of intensely personal
questioning or transformation of belief. Very immersed himself in the theology of the
Unitarian creed, intending for himself a career as a minister and poet. This
can be viewed as an active rebellion against his mother's tenacious defense of
atheism.
In Very,
Emerson saw someone that had gone too far; in Emerson, Very saw someone who was
unwilling to go far enough. They were fascinated by each other's company,
though their relationship was never entirely placid. Emerson would subsequently
refer to Very as his "brave saint.’
Having learned
to avoid those likely to be strongly opposed to his message, Very concentrated
on converting those who already had one foot in his camp. However, no one Channing,
Emerson, Alcott, Hawthorne, Sophia Peabody or Elizabeth Peabody or in fact
anyone was willing to give up all in order to follow him. He was to remain
without disciples. He repeatedly returned
to the theme of a spiritual life guided by the complete submergence of the
individual will into the nature of God. Such a conception of "will-less
existence," which has much in common with both mysticism and with other
traditional Christian forms of quietist moralism, accounts for what readers
have noted as the burning intensity of Very's better poems, and his unusual
technique of assuming the voice of God or the Spirit in some of them.
Very's poetic reputation had grown
to an extent with the increasing importance of the Transcendentalist movement
even though he was in many ways closer to earlier Christian and Unitarian
thinking than Transcendentalism. He made a much needed contribution to
Transcendentalism--a number of poems of stylistic excellence and technical
polish which embodied a unique and forceful religious vision.
William “Ellery” Channing (1817–1901)
was undisciplined from childhood, and he dropped out of Harvard and then failed
once again as a law student. From an
early age, however, he pointed out each flower, bird, or insect that he
observed in the natural world around him.
Everyone
from Thoreau to the elder Henry James commented on the precise care and
attentiveness of his observations. He examined objects with an almost childlike
intensity.
He
was unable to provide, financially or emotionally, for his wife (the sister of
Margaret Fuller) or their five children. She left him and sent the children to
relatives at a time when such
a
marital separation was almost unheard of among members of polite society.
Channing sent many of his curious
poems to Emerson to publish in The Dial, and Emerson did so while consistently
defending Channing’s strange poetry against the criticism of others. Thoreau
called the lyric poems “sublime-slipshod,” by which he seems to have meant
vaguely abstract and technically careless.
Edgar Allan Poe was even harsher in his review: “His book contains about
sixty-three things, which he calls poems, and which he no doubt seriously
supposes them to be. They are full of all kinds of mistakes, of which the most
important is
that
of their having been printed at all.”
In
1839, Channing traveled to Illinois, where he lived in a tiny dirt-floored hut
and farmed a small plot with his own hands. This effort to get back to the land
would later inspire his more famous friend.
Ten years after this time as a hermit, Thoreau and Channing took a trip
to Cape Cod, the first of a number of such trips. Channing was probably Thoreau’s best friend,
and in fact, Channing later wrote a letter to Thoreau in which he said: “I see
nothing for you on this earth but that field which I once christened ‘Briars’;
go out upon that, build yourself a hut, and there begin the grand process of
devouring yourself alive. I see no alternative, no other hope for you.”
Channing
was not widely known for his poetry, then or now, but he was significantly the
first person to write a book-length biography of Thoreau; Thoreau, the
Poet-Naturalist (1873) which became his most important and widely read work
and inspired interest in, and subsequent writing about, his more famous eccentric
friend. Channing lived on until 1901,
like Conway, bringing the direct influence of New England Transcendentalism
into the dawn of the 20th century.
3. Transcendentalism
was not simply about those major and minor figures who developed and
promulgated its doctrines, but it was also about a series of attempts at new
ways of living that had a powerful impact on 19th-century thinking. Social
instability, as well as the gradual move from agrarian to urban life, led
numerous individuals to consider alternative modes of family and social
organization. Brook Farm, perhaps the most well-known of these experiments, was
founded by George Ripley. Bronson Alcott founded Fruitlands and the Temple
School which was a sort of idealized educational plan for living, and then
there was Walden Pond; a new version of a kind of utopia. But, the social experiments of the period
also included religious communities and loose linkages of like-minded individuals.
The goal was often to find smaller social groupings within the wider society
that could produce better methods for sharing property, educating the young,
and producing a unified vision of social life. The idea of utopia goes back to Thomas More
and Plato, but 19th-century America contributed its own Transcendentalist versions.
America has been a land of
experimental communities, especially during the 19th century, and a bit of background
will help make sense of the Transcendentalist versions of this phenomenon. In England, in 1772, “Mother” Ann Lee was
told by God that “a place had been prepared” for her followers in America. Nine
believers broke with the Quakers and founded the United Society of Believers in
Christ’s Second Appearing, linking such utopian movements historically with the
founding of America itself as a new “promised” land. Mother Ann and her followers built the
original Shaker community in America in the rugged wilds of New York State, in
which ecstatic visions led to religious ceremonies of “shaking.” Shakers
believed in a universal equality that included non-Christians,
African-Americans, and Native Americans, some of whom joined these communities.
The Shakers would go on to become one of the most durable communal sects in
America, establishing almost 20 communities that included nearly 4,000 members
by 1850. Up to 20,000 Americans may have lived in Shaker communities for some
period of time.
Another community, Oneida, founded by John H. Noyes, was another of the most well known
utopian communes in American history. Noyes and his followers shared
land and property for approximately three decades, and they lived in a single
group marriage that included up to 200 individuals, variously called “free
love” or “complex marriage.” Resistant
to turning former city dwellers into successful agrarian farmers, they
established a number of business concerns, the most famous of which evolved
eventually into the Oneida flatware company.
New
Harmony, in both Indiana and Pennsylvania, became another widely influential
communal experiment. The community was
founded as early as 1804 by George Rapp and later sold to Robert Owen. Owen was a visionary Welsh reformer who
thought that society might be perfected on the basis of free public education
and the abolition of social classes and personal
wealth;
the community eventually introduced kindergartens and vocational education. Its members included a wide range of
scientists (especially geologists), artists, authors, and teachers. Noted
theologian Paul Tillich is buried there.
The Nashoba community was perhaps
the most directly socialist model for subsequent Transcendentalist experiments
at Brook Farm and Fruitlands. Frances
Wright came from a prosperous Scots family and became well known for her essays
on social ethics. While at New Harmony,
Wright conceived of a community that might address the wrongs of the slave
system, and imagined an environment in which former slaves could become
self-reliant through education and so-called “schools of industry” designed to
produce funds that could buy freedom and return those who wished to Africa, as
Marcus Garvey would advocate later. In
1826, Wright founded Nashoba, which lasted for four years, in Tennessee, with a
handful of whites and 15 free blacks. The
community failed in part because whites remained in control through a system of
overseers. Reality did not always live up to such ideals.
George Ripley’s Brook Farm and
Bronson Alcott’s Fruitlands became the two most successful Transcendentalist
attempts at communal living. Brook Farm
was established by former Unitarian minister George Ripley in 1841 in an effort
to create a classless society. The goal was to reduce physical labor through
shared activity and thereby advance intellectual and spiritual growth. Although it began with only 20 members in
1841 it had close to 200 followers by the time it collapsed. The community succeeded well for a time based
on a rational sharing of labor as well as a link between manual and mental
labor. Members worked in return for food
and lodging on the farm; additional income was derived from the well-respected
school on site.
Charles
Dana, a Brook Farm resident who later became famous as a newspaper editor and
secretary of war during the Civil War, said, “In the first place we have
abolished domestic servitude. In the second place we have secured thorough education
for all, and in the third place we have established justice to the laborer.” Brook Farm, more than any other utopian
experiment in American history, made an impression on social thinkers and
intellectuals. As Transcendentalists, Ripley and his followers believed deeply
in the power of each individual to contribute to creating a better world. Brook Farm, unlike many such communes,
preserved a belief in private ownership that did not threaten earlier American ideas
about property, the nuclear family, and church or state authority.
Fruitlands
was Bronson Alcott’s idea, an outgrowth of his Temple School. Like Brook Farm, Fruitlands sought a rural
retreat that would challenge industrial capitalism, but this dream lasted less
than a year, from 1843–1844. Fruitlands
turned out to be even less practical than Ripley’s experiment: no animal food
or animal labor, only the Alcott and Lane families and a handful of eccentrics
(a nudist, a cracker-eater), as Louisa May later recorded in her punning
essay,
“Transcendental Wild Oats.” When the
impractical male idealists would travel to spread the word about their utopian
dreams, only the women and children were left behind to work. “They look well in
July,” Emerson himself said after a visit there: “We shall see them in
December.”
Thoreau’s
Walden was also a version of a utopian community even if it was a community of
one. There is a sense in which all
utopian communities are experiments, not intended to last forever but, rather,
to explore new possibilities for interactions among humans. The sense of a life of limitless
possibilities is strong in all these people. When Thoreau said, in Walden,
“I did not wish to live what was not life, living is so dear,” he was expanding
on an idea put forth earlier by Emerson.
These reflections on Walden is a reminder of why so many Americans have
been drawn to the ideal of utopian communities, which may not last but have a
powerful impact nonetheless.
Charles and Myrtle Fillmore
envisioned a place where Unity workers and students could go to pray, work and
recreate themselves physically and spiritually, so it was natural for the
Fillmores to find a place suitable for their “Unity family.”[2] Hence Unity Village was born. Home to Unity Institute and Seminary, and Silent
Unity among others, Unity Village could be described as an experiment in
utopian society.
Okay so you are a YES vote that the Fillmores wanted to create a Utopian community in Unity Village! I'm not sure I see that - although I do remember that newspaper article where Lowell Fillmore said that Unity Village was an experiment and that they were feeling their way.
ReplyDelete